Some of our elderly viewers may remember Hillary Clinton: she was the woman who had her butt handed to her during the 2016 Presidential debates by Donald Trump. Well, you’ll be pleased to know she has some absolutely bipartisan, completely fair, deeply insightful deep insights on how to debate both people who went on to become actual presidents.
Also, her new book cover looks like a four-dollar anime filter for TikTok.
Listen here on Soundcloud:
She doesn’t even look like young Hillary Clinton. I’m trying to compare it to her first years as First Lady, and even then, I can’t see any resemblance.
I think maybe it would help if the American Republic came up with a formal title for La Clinton to keep the old trout happy. Let’s look at some examples from Britain you could adapt. Here in the UK the next person in line to the throne (if no one can come between them and the throne, like Prince William) is the Heir Apparent. The next in line that could be moved down one by a birth (e.g. a childless monarch’s sibling) is the Heir Presumptive. Maybe Hillary could be the Heir Repulsive. There are legends of the legendary King… Read more »
Her title could be: “Exalted extreme Repulsiveness”.
Hildebeast has to be very happy with Slo Joe’s “performance” last night.
Bet she called the head of the DNC and graciously offered to step in as the nominee.
Having read a few other “Watch for this:…” stories, I’ve come to the conclusion that they only thing the public needs to be on the look out for is the blatant, in yer face, hate of all cnn people and especially the “non-partisan moderators.” IF – note the big “IF” – I look at it tonight it will be because I’m looking for a few laughs, and the paint has already dried.
Jeez, guys!
Give a fella a warning before you put an image of that beast on my screen?!
<goes looking for optical bleach>
Loved this one!
Since she was never the “Master Politician/Liar” that her husband is,
she sunk her presidential ship by spontaneously using the now infamous word,
“deplorables”, she was actually speaking her truth. Her audience that day were liberal “donors” – Streisand was there, and they were clapping at her use of that word for Trump’s voters. I happened to be watching and was stunned. Her “honesty” I believe, sunk her “Presidential” ship. Could not have happened to a more deserving person. One thing is for sure, she will not go “gentle” into that good night!
While Obama was slick enough to get away with the “Bitter clinger” remark, Hillary is too unlikable to pull off that kind of honesty
Many years ago Democrats discovered that there are enough people who if you tell them what they want to hear will believe you and vote for you. It doesn’t make any difference to such people if what you’re telling them is true or not. Pretty much all politicians will employ ‘spin’ to shade the truth to their own advantage and that’s nothing new. What has changed is that the Democrat Party has forsaken slanting the truth and adopted straight up lying with total abandonment of any semblance to truth. It’s more than a little bit astonishing that there are so… Read more »
I remember not too long ago in the political world when the terms “lie” or “lying” were rarely used, especially in journalism. Lots of other euphemisms used instead, such as “inaccurate” or “mistaken” or “incorrect”. Enter Bill and Hillary Clinton in the national political scene in the early 90s. They learned long ago the exact point you’re making — that a big chunk of the electorate will believe anything you tell them. Both of the Clinton criminals made huge efforts, like most politicians, to not say anything of note to begin with, to fluff around the topic, to say essentially… Read more »
All very true and accurate. It’s almost as if the Second Law of Thermodynamics applies to political veracity. Of course that would be a double edged sword because as veracity flows downhill to falsity then lies hoist themselves on their own petards and eventually lose their desired effect. The “best” lies, meaning the most effective ones, contain a large degree of truth. It’s the untrue part that is the trap, the true parts are there to make you step into it. The more truth a lie contains the more effective and harder to detect it is. An extremely well crafted… Read more »
Did Hilary write that editorial on a Wednesday, by any chance? That’s the day that Chris Plante always introduces as “Hump day in the Clinton household. Which means a special day for Bill, while it’s something different for Hillary. As usual, she wakes up in a pool of dried vomit on her kitchen’s linoleum floor, with an empty box of chardonnay nearby and the Secret Service looking down and shaking their heads in disapproval.”
Since the piece that Scott quoted was much more of a political attack ad than any sort of “here’s my take on debating Biden and Trump” analysis, I’m not convinced that Hillary wrote that piece to begin with. One of her flunkies wrote it and Hillary approved it.
That’s a given, though I give her ghost writer credit for crating a piece that sounds like Hillary’s insipid, dishonest voice
The NY Slimes has reached the stage of just wearing journalism as a skinsuit and expecting respect.
Then again, they still haven’t returned Walter Duranty’s Pulitzer
Half the electorate believes that Biden is a “uniter”, the last four years have been great, and our world and the US standing in it is more safe with his guidance.
“The Emperor’s New Clothes” comes to mind.
Headlines I expect for tomorrow’s news sites;
brother Bob , thanks so much for the laughter. Just beautiful headlines for the msm print media.
Such things make me wonder what those headline authors are getting on the side … money, favors, spotlight, …?