The psychotic hallucinations have (for now, at least) vanished.
You know, for the longest time I could not understand how AI could be so amazingly good at the one thing CGI was so terrible at; namely, rendering realistic humans. And then it hit me: of all of the billions (trillions?) of images available online, the vast majority of them are photos of people, especially women, especially good-looking women. It renders them so well because there’s just so much data to draw on.
It’s a bit weird how cutting-edge, 21st Century technology can take us back to the past. Here are two brief interludes for you…
Up first: back to the Fifties for three minutes of beautiful women without any trace of green hair, face piercings or tattoos:
Or maybe the groovy Sixties was more of your bag, man:
And finally, for those fantasy fans out there, we present AI’s amazing ability to combine the beautiful with the otherworldly:
Imagine if Mike Myers had these images available for “Austin Powers, International Man of Mystery.”
In other words, if The Radical Left manages to take control of AI, when we ask for videos of beautiful women they’ll be 400 pounds with blue hair and a nose ring. Maybe with a trans-sexual child at their side for an accessory
Lol … I don’t think we want AI “rending” human beings whether it does it well or not. Just sayin’.
Some comments about your comment:
“Soylent Green is people!”
“It’s a cookbook!”
“I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti”
Ah, long pig on rye!😬
This was probably the ultimate Freudian slip. Fixed. And thanks.